{ "claims": [ { "boundary": "這是對公開規則文字的判讀。不代表北市實際上從未協調，也不代表已證實有人刻意鑽漏洞。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-10", "e-src-11", "e-src-12", "e-src-14" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-f86e5b6c301e", "scope": { "geography": "台北市", "population": "經 1999 與陳情系統被檢舉的店家", "time": "2024 年 12 月修正後至 2026 年 11 月 14 日" }, "status": "supported", "text": "台北市陳情規則第 10 點以「同一事由」避免重複稽查，第 11 點以「同一陳情人」反映不同事由為單位；1999 併案限同一地點、同一派工機關、辦理時限內。公開規則中，沒有跨局處、跨事由合併同一家店案件的規定。" }, { "boundary": "45 件是議員統計，「件」指檢舉還是到場並不清楚；只有文化局那一件經市府公開說明處理經過。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-3", "e-src-4", "e-src-5" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-ddd7617d7a8d", "scope": { "geography": "台北市", "population": "議員點名的七家罷免連署店家", "time": "2025 年 2 月" }, "status": "partially_supported", "text": "2025 年 2 月罷免連署期間，民進黨議員統計七家協助連署的店家一週內共被檢舉 45 件，分交環保局、建管處、勞動局等局處；文化局證實接到商業處轉來的 1999 陳情後，打電話提醒雁域。" }, { "boundary": "不能據此推論有多少稽查是衝著罷免店家，也不能計算 45／4,300 這類比例。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-4", "e-src-15" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-59f06393b710", "scope": { "geography": "台北市", "population": "台北市環保局稽查總量與七家罷免店家", "time": "2025 年 1 至 4 月" }, "status": "synthesis", "text": "市府在議會用環保局每月平均 4,300 件、總量未明顯增加來回應，這個數字回答不了少數店家是否被集中檢舉。" }, { "boundary": "截至 2026 年 11 月 14 日，未見改善、複查或裁罰的後續報導，無法判斷是否涉及報復。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-1", "e-src-2" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-84f1c514472e", "scope": { "geography": "台北市南港區", "population": "一家豆花店", "time": "2026 年 11 月 4 日至 14 日" }, "status": "supported", "text": "南港豆花店發沈伯洋應援物當天，建管處依「招牌可能掉落」的陳情到場；11 月 5 日發文要求 14 天內改善，受訪時尚未裁罰。" }, { "boundary": "這是檢方指控與程序裁定，不是有罪判決；我們尚未取得實體判決。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-19", "e-src-20", "e-src-22", "e-src-23", "e-src-24" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-e81c10382af0", "scope": { "geography": "花蓮縣", "population": "花蓮縣民政處與花蓮市戶政事務所相關人員", "time": "2025 年 2 月至 2026 年 9 月" }, "status": "supported", "text": "花蓮地檢署起訴花蓮縣民政處長等三人，指控他們指示戶政人員登門查問罷免連署簽名；起訴新聞稿記載部屬曾提出反對。花蓮地院 2026 年 9 月 3 日裁定延長限制出境。" }, { "boundary": "我們沒有找到寄給原收文單位的撤函或更正函，但不排除另有未公開的更正；也不能據此認定市場處違法。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-27", "e-src-28", "e-src-29", "e-src-30", "e-src-31", "e-src-34", "e-src-35" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516", "scope": { "geography": "台北市攤販集中場（含饒河夜市）", "population": "52 個攤販集中場自治會、協會與攤商", "time": "2026 年 9 月至 11 月" }, "status": "supported", "text": "市場處 2026 年 9 月 9 日寄給 52 個攤販集中場自治會、協會的宣導函，主旨寫「遵守行政中立相關事宜」；有攤商受訪說，前輩轉告他拿掉候選人文宣。市場處事後向媒體表示，攤販私人攤車、衣帽不在限制範圍。" }, { "boundary": "95 國 9 的二審結果與是否實際給付都未知；我們沒找到把多次合法上門加總、認定為騷擾或差別待遇的判決。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-43", "e-src-44", "e-src-45", "e-src-46", "e-src-47" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-c685c7e1919d", "scope": { "geography": "台灣", "population": "受行政稽查的業者或執業者", "time": "2004 年至 2026 年" }, "status": "supported", "text": "沒有罰單仍可能有救濟管道：一般給付訴訟可處理行政處分以外的作為；台北地院 95 年度國字第 9 號一審認定一次衛生稽查欠缺法定基礎、逾越必要程度，判賠 39 萬元；桃園地院 2026 年一件國賠案則判業者敗訴。" }, { "boundary": "只適用這兩案，不能外推到其他案例，也不能用來判斷哪一黨比較常這樣做。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-39", "e-src-40", "e-src-41" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-9ca0ddfc9295", "scope": { "geography": "屏東縣、新北市", "population": "兩家被質疑遭查水表的業者", "time": "2020 年、2025 年" }, "status": "supported", "text": "屏東消防局到廠是業者自己申報的例行安檢；新北「罰 20 萬」的說法被衛生局否定，店長也表示不認為和政治有關。兩案的報復說法都被反證削弱。" }, { "boundary": "這是藝術補助領域的做法，不是一般稽查規則；懲處人數與賠償金額來自當地報導，判決全文未取得。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-51", "e-src-52", "e-src-53", "e-src-54", "e-src-55", "e-src-56" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507", "scope": { "geography": "南韓", "population": "被列入文化黑名單的藝術人與團體", "time": "2018 年至 2024 年" }, "status": "supported", "text": "南韓真相調查委員會查出文化黑名單上有 8,931 名文化藝術人、342 個團體，後續有刑事定罪、分兩級的國家賠償，並立法禁止基於政治意見不利對待藝術人。" }, { "boundary": "被告是官員個人；賠償是否已實際給付未查；美國的舉證規則不是台灣現行規則。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-57", "e-src-58", "e-src-59", "e-src-60" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-448010b36a34", "scope": { "geography": "美國邁阿密", "population": "兩名業主與一名市議員", "time": "2023 年至 2026 年 3 月" }, "status": "supported", "text": "邁阿密 Fuller 與 Pinilla 控告市議員 Carollo 以選擇性稽查報復，陪審團判賠 6,350 萬美元；上訴法院維持判決，美國最高法院 2026 年 3 月拒絕受理。" }, { "boundary": "這是改革建議。若逐店紀錄顯示各局處已協調、每次到場都有必要理由，我們會改判。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-11", "e-src-14", "e-src-25" ], "id": "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-03672edbd091", "scope": { "geography": "台北市", "population": "台北市各稽查局處與被檢舉店家", "time": "2026 年 11 月起" }, "status": "synthesis", "text": "台北市研考會應訂出以店家為單位的彙整、協調與重新到場理由，並公布去除身分線索的處理結果；機關應說明每次接觸的必要。" } ], "evidence": [ { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-004682eefda6" ], "id": "e-src-1", "locator": "三立新聞 1934196 號；2026-11-04 下午南港豆花店外排隊領沈伯洋飄帶、資料夾，同日建管處到場段落", "source_id": "src-1", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-84f1c514472e" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-004682eefda6" ], "id": "e-src-2", "locator": "鏡週刊轉載三立 setn_1934196；目擊民眾「要看營利事業登記證」說法、建管處「招牌可能掉落」陳情回應、招牌颱風受損燈管外露段落", "source_id": "src-2", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-84f1c514472e" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-3", "locator": "中央社 202502200062；2025-02-20 許淑華、趙怡翔、林亮君記者會，2-11 起 1999 密集檢舉、分派環保局／建管處／勞動局、「每家次數達5件以上」段落", "source_id": "src-3", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-ddd7617d7a8d" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-646e33082e8e" ], "id": "e-src-4", "locator": "匯流新聞網（yam 20250220163038）；議員統計一週件數表列（雁域、鳥咖啡、配個咖啡等七家合計 45 件）、勞動局 2-19 發函要求 2-21 前回覆段落", "source_id": "src-4", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-59f06393b710", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-ddd7617d7a8d" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-5", "locator": "臺北市文化局新聞說明；商業處轉來 1999 陳情詢問雁域地址是否登記演藝團體、查證後電話提醒守法、不干涉政治立場段落", "source_id": "src-5", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-ddd7617d7a8d" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-6", "locator": "民視 2025215P07M1；雁域負責人受訪稱店內「完全沒有用食用油」卻遭檢舉廢油段落", "source_id": "src-6", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-7", "locator": "民視 2025220W0362；左轉有書經營者稱罷團「早就準備好律師團，甚至還有建築師」段落", "source_id": "src-7", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-8", "locator": "民進黨新聞 media/contents/11087；成立律師團、公開徵求權利受侵害事證段落", "source_id": "src-8", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-9", "locator": "大安罷團 statement 頁；基層人員對浮濫檢舉感到無奈之陳述", "source_id": "src-9", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-10", "locator": "臺北市法規查詢 FL001226 修正理由；2024-12-06 修正，避免被檢舉人遭重複稽查之說明", "source_id": "src-10", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-f86e5b6c301e" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-11", "locator": "臺北市法規查詢 FL001226 條文；第 10 點（同一事由一再陳情特定人避免重複稽查、主權責機關邀集統一時間前往）、第 11 點（同一陳情人不同事由、持續或大量耗費行政資源經簽報首長同意得不予處理）", "source_id": "src-11", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-03672edbd091", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-f86e5b6c301e" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-12", "locator": "1999 熱線實施計畫 PDF（2024 年 8 月修訂）；同一報案地點辦理時限內重複派工併案、同一人連續兩次通報同一事由查無違規報研考會改立陳情案之條文", "source_id": "src-12", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-f86e5b6c301e" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-13", "locator": "臺北市訴願決定 1613-029；內湖店家遭反覆檢舉噪音、稽查大隊多次未查獲、2025 年 3 月回覆不再處理，及以回覆非行政處分為由不受理部分", "source_id": "src-13", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-14", "locator": "臺北市研考會陳情作業程序頁；預警機制（以各案件類別每週件數是否異常為準）段落", "source_id": "src-14", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-03672edbd091", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-f86e5b6c301e" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-646e33082e8e" ], "id": "e-src-15", "locator": "臺北市議會 2025-04-10 施政報告速記錄（1140410-1）；陳慈慧「被臺北市政府多個局處輪流查水表」、李明賢稱勞動局「從來沒有去稽查」發言", "source_id": "src-15", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-59f06393b710" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-16", "locator": "臺北市議會 2025-04-10 施政報告速記錄（1140410-3）；楊植斗建議查過無問題即結案、蔣萬安答「不行」「只要有人檢舉，我們就依照規定到現場查看」段落（與速記錄5合引）", "source_id": "src-16", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-17", "locator": "臺北市議會 2025-04-10 施政報告速記錄（1140410-5）；蔣萬安答詢「誠如議員所講的」、公務人員「不能吃案」段落（與速記錄3合引）", "source_id": "src-17", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-18", "locator": "Tamworth Borough Council, Food and Food Premises Complaints Policy 2025–2028；投訴風險評估、「適當時」調查之考量因素（嚴重性、合規紀錄、證據、資源、政治因素）", "source_id": "src-18", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-19", "locator": "中央社 202505140123；2025-02-05 戶政人員登門查訪罷免提議書、2025-05-14 花蓮地檢起訴明良臻、吳俊毅、鍾威霆依個資法段落", "source_id": "src-19", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-e81c10382af0" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-20", "locator": "花蓮地檢署 1140514 偵結新聞稿 PDF；戶政主任提出疑義仍被要求「強力執行」、同仁反對、「因畏於長官之權勢，未敢公然違抗」段落", "source_id": "src-20", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-e81c10382af0" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-21", "locator": "公視新聞 751244；花蓮戶政查訪罷免提議書案相關報導（正文引用處截斷，具體段落待補）", "source_id": "src-21", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-22", "locator": "中央社 202508210111；明良臻 2025-08-20 回任縣府簡任十職等機要秘書、縣府無罪推定說明段落", "source_id": "src-22", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-e81c10382af0" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-328cc4f966bb" ], "id": "e-src-23", "locator": "司法院新聞 cp-1888-1323873；花蓮地院 114 年度訴字第 61 號延長限制出境說明", "source_id": "src-23", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-e81c10382af0" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-328cc4f966bb" ], "id": "e-src-24", "locator": "花蓮地院 114 年度訴字第 61 號裁定（2026-09-03）；延長限制出境八個月及「確保訴訟進行、非認定有罪」理由", "source_id": "src-24", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-e81c10382af0" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-25", "locator": "公務人員行政中立法（S0110036）第 4 條、第 14 條、第 15 條", "source_id": "src-25", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-03672edbd091" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b5d83e2430e4" ], "id": "e-src-26", "locator": "中央社 202507150146；玉里分局詢問懸掛罷免看板民眾個資、縣警局要求「不得再詢問、記錄懸掛或設置民眾個資」段落", "source_id": "src-26", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-27", "locator": "中央社 202609180303；市場處 2026-09-09 依選罷法第 52 條第 3 項函請攤販集中場自治組織加強宣導段落", "source_id": "src-27", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b47d8ba3af75" ], "id": "e-src-28", "locator": "民視財經 2026918W0468；致饒河夜市公文畫面「應遵守行政中立相關事宜」「請勿懸掛旗幟等競選廣告」", "source_id": "src-28", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b47d8ba3af75" ], "id": "e-src-29", "locator": "自由時報 5578578；市場處提供公文電子檔，52 個自治會、協會受文，主旨「遵守行政中立相關事宜」、攤販集中場為「市場處管轄的公共設施」段落", "source_id": "src-29", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b47d8ba3af75" ], "id": "e-src-30", "locator": "鏡週刊 20260918edi041；引述函文「另若發現攤販插設選舉活動旗幟或競選廣告，請貴會立即拆除」段落", "source_id": "src-30", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-31", "locator": "鏡新聞 20260919sot1817001；市場處攤販旗幟公文爭議相關報導（正文未明列引用段落）", "source_id": "src-31", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-32", "locator": "公職人員選舉罷免法（D0020010）第 52 條第 3 項", "source_id": "src-32", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b47d8ba3af75" ], "id": "e-src-33", "locator": "民視 2026923w0233；林亮君調閱 2020、2022 年市場處公文（對象為「公有市場」）、2026-09-23 蔣萬安「標準都是一致的」說法段落", "source_id": "src-33", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-34", "locator": "聯合報 9763789；市場處見報當晚稱「市府從未禁止攤販個人使用或穿戴競選相關物品」段落", "source_id": "src-34", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-35", "locator": "中央社 202609190069；市場處稱攤販「個人的攤車、衣帽、口罩等私物不在限制範圍」段落", "source_id": "src-35", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-36", "locator": "民視 2026B13P12M1；2026-11-13 蔣萬安逛饒河夜市、攤商掛其競選旗幟、洪健益質疑標準不一段落", "source_id": "src-36", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-37", "locator": "中央社 202611140081；饒河夜市競選旗幟標準爭議後續報導（正文引用處截斷，具體段落待補）", "source_id": "src-37", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-38", "locator": "中央社 201907180095；高雄店家稱遭檢舉、市府否認針對單一店家段落", "source_id": "src-38", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-39", "locator": "中央社 202012030069；屏東業者證實為委託申報之兩年一次安檢、仍覺時間「巧合」段落", "source_id": "src-39", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-9ca0ddfc9295" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-40", "locator": "新北市衛生局新聞稿〈針對近日民代質疑查水表的無端指控…嚴正駁斥說明〉；否定「罰 20 萬」說法", "source_id": "src-40", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-9ca0ddfc9295" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-41", "locator": "NOWnews 6675546；新北店長稱「不認為跟政治有關係」段落", "source_id": "src-41", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-9ca0ddfc9295" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-42", "locator": "鏡報（鏡週刊轉載 mirrordaily_95489）；大安店家發應援物後遭報警、議員轉述警方未取締並提醒排隊擾鄰段落", "source_id": "src-42", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-43", "locator": "法務部裁判要旨彙編 PDF 頁 207；最高行政法院 2004 年裁定：儲氣槽「內部檢查」屬不以發生法律效果為目的之事實行為、預告檢查通知函不得單獨爭訟", "source_id": "src-43", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-c685c7e1919d" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-44", "locator": "臺北市法規委員會函釋 FE242242；公車業者不服評鑑內容「應依行政訴訟法第 8 條之一般給付訴訟」段落", "source_id": "src-44", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-c685c7e1919d" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-45", "locator": "最高行政法院 110 年度上字第 673 號判決（2023-05-30）；預防性不作為訴訟及「仍須以其對該行政機關享有公法上之請求權」理由段", "source_id": "src-45", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-c685c7e1919d" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-46", "locator": "桃園地院 114 年度重國字第 2 號判決（2026-04-30）；肉品封存求償 2,231 萬餘元、稽查人員判斷「應屬合理判斷」理由段", "source_id": "src-46", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-c685c7e1919d" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-af7d4a327285" ], "id": "e-src-47", "locator": "台北地院 95 年度國字第 9 號判決（2008-06-20）；駁斥衛生局「無須事先通知醫療機構」抗辯、稽查欠缺法定基礎逾越必要程度、判賠 39 萬元段", "source_id": "src-47", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-c685c7e1919d" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-48", "locator": "行政程序法（A0030055）第 6 條", "source_id": "src-48", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-646e33082e8e", "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-a83cdf1168b3" ], "id": "e-src-49", "locator": "臺北市資料大平臺 北市陳情系統類別資料集；欄位說明（無被檢舉店家或地址欄位）", "source_id": "src-49", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-a83cdf1168b3" ], "id": "e-src-50", "locator": "臺北市資料大平臺 公共安全聯合稽查資料 rid d35ec628…；2025 年 2 月 16 筆，地址、排定對象（業別）、備註欄位", "source_id": "src-50", "supports": [] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-51", "locator": "韓聯社 AKR20180508081451005；文化體育觀光部真相調查委員會公布黑名單文化藝術人 8,931 人、團體 342 個及道歉、究責、補償、立法建議段落", "source_id": "src-51", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-52", "locator": "韓國大法院新聞 seqnum 6973；2020 年認定以政治理由排除補助之指示屬濫用職權判決說明", "source_id": "src-52", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-53", "locator": "MBC 2024 article 6568041；金淇春判刑 2 年、趙允旋 1 年 2 個月更審判決 2024 年確定段落", "source_id": "src-53", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-54", "locator": "NewsPim 20220121000765；首爾中央地方法院國家賠償判決：列名者每人 1,000 萬韓元、實際被排除補助者每人 1,300 萬韓元段落", "source_id": "src-54", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-55", "locator": "韓聯社 AKR20181231209951005；政府對涉案公務員移送偵查與懲戒人數段落", "source_id": "src-55", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-56", "locator": "韓國國家法令資訊中心《藝術人權利保障法》第 8 條", "source_id": "src-56", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-57", "locator": "美國第十一巡迴上訴法院 No. 23-12167 未公開判決 PDF；Fuller & Pinilla 指控 Carollo 選擇性稽查與執法、陪審團賠償 6,350 萬美元、維持駁回審判無效聲請及其餘上訴欠缺管轄權部分", "source_id": "src-57", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-448010b36a34" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-58", "locator": "美國最高法院案卷 Docket No. 25-771（正文引用處截斷，具體條目待補）", "source_id": "src-58", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-448010b36a34" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-59", "locator": "Mt. Healthy City School Dist. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977)；受保護言論為重要或促成因素後由政府舉證同樣決定之部分", "source_id": "src-59", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-448010b36a34" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [], "id": "e-src-60", "locator": "Gonzalez v. Trevino, No. 22-1025 判決全文；原告不必提出「幾乎一模一樣」對照者、得以客觀資料證明此類行為平常幾乎不被執法之部分", "source_id": "src-60", "supports": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-448010b36a34" ] }, { "bounds_unknowns": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-3d8edd8ebf60" ], "id": "e-page", "locator": "頁面「還不知道、而且會改變結論的」區段", "source_id": "src-page", "supports": [] } ], "inquiry": { "id": "pursuit_426851389ceeaf965b98", "reader_promise": "北市的防重複稽查規則，各自按同一事由或同一陳情人來分。同一家店被不同局處輪流找上，這份負擔沒有人合起來算。沒有罰單，店家仍可能找到救濟管道。可是要證明自己被差別對待，需要的比較紀錄在政府手上。", "root_question": "被查到沒事的店，能去哪裡討公道？從南港豆花店、饒河夜市到花蓮戶政登門的「查水表」爭議", "updated_at": "2026-11-14T12:22:29+00:00" }, "queries": [ { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-f86e5b6c301e", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-ddd7617d7a8d", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-59f06393b710", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-84f1c514472e", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-e81c10382af0", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-c685c7e1919d", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-9ca0ddfc9295", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-448010b36a34", "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-03672edbd091" ], "unknown_ids": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-646e33082e8e", "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-a83cdf1168b3", "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-328cc4f966bb", "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-004682eefda6", "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b47d8ba3af75", "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-af7d4a327285", "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-3d8edd8ebf60", "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b5d83e2430e4" ] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-36a3339423a9", "text": "被查到沒事的店，能去哪裡討公道？從南港豆花店、饒河夜市到花蓮戶政登門的「查水表」爭議" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-f86e5b6c301e" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-f86e5b6c301e", "text": "台北市陳情規則第 10 點以「同一事由」避免重複稽查，第 11 點以「同一陳情人」反映不同事由為單位；1999 併案限同一地點、同一派工機關、辦理時限內。公開規則中，沒有跨局處、跨事由合併同一家店案件的規定。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-ddd7617d7a8d" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-ddd7617d7a8d", "text": "2025 年 2 月罷免連署期間，民進黨議員統計七家協助連署的店家一週內共被檢舉 45 件，分交環保局、建管處、勞動局等局處；文化局證實接到商業處轉來的 1999 陳情後，打電話提醒雁域。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-59f06393b710" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-59f06393b710", "text": "市府在議會用環保局每月平均 4,300 件、總量未明顯增加來回應，這個數字回答不了少數店家是否被集中檢舉。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-84f1c514472e" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-84f1c514472e", "text": "南港豆花店發沈伯洋應援物當天，建管處依「招牌可能掉落」的陳情到場；11 月 5 日發文要求 14 天內改善，受訪時尚未裁罰。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-e81c10382af0" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-e81c10382af0", "text": "花蓮地檢署起訴花蓮縣民政處長等三人，指控他們指示戶政人員登門查問罷免連署簽名；起訴新聞稿記載部屬曾提出反對。花蓮地院 2026 年 9 月 3 日裁定延長限制出境。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-cda9bc2c4516", "text": "市場處 2026 年 9 月 9 日寄給 52 個攤販集中場自治會、協會的宣導函，主旨寫「遵守行政中立相關事宜」；有攤商受訪說，前輩轉告他拿掉候選人文宣。市場處事後向媒體表示，攤販私人攤車、衣帽不在限制範圍。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-c685c7e1919d" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-c685c7e1919d", "text": "沒有罰單仍可能有救濟管道：一般給付訴訟可處理行政處分以外的作為；台北地院 95 年度國字第 9 號一審認定一次衛生稽查欠缺法定基礎、逾越必要程度，判賠 39 萬元；桃園地院 2026 年一件國賠案則判業者敗訴。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-9ca0ddfc9295" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-9ca0ddfc9295", "text": "屏東消防局到廠是業者自己申報的例行安檢；新北「罰 20 萬」的說法被衛生局否定，店長也表示不認為和政治有關。兩案的報復說法都被反證削弱。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-47698809a507", "text": "南韓真相調查委員會查出文化黑名單上有 8,931 名文化藝術人、342 個團體，後續有刑事定罪、分兩級的國家賠償，並立法禁止基於政治意見不利對待藝術人。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-448010b36a34" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-448010b36a34", "text": "邁阿密 Fuller 與 Pinilla 控告市議員 Carollo 以選擇性稽查報復，陪審團判賠 6,350 萬美元；上訴法院維持判決，美國最高法院 2026 年 3 月拒絕受理。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [ "claim-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-03672edbd091" ], "unknown_ids": [] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-03672edbd091", "text": "台北市研考會應訂出以店家為單位的彙整、協調與重新到場理由，並公布去除身分線索的處理結果；機關應說明每次接觸的必要。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [], "unknown_ids": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-646e33082e8e" ] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-646e33082e8e", "text": "2025 年 2 月罷免店家在 1999 與各局處的逐店紀錄：檢舉件數、去重後的陳情人數、實際到場、裁罰，以及是否適用第 10、11 點和跨局處協調。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [], "unknown_ids": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-a83cdf1168b3" ] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-a83cdf1168b3", "text": "同區同業平常被稽查的頻率。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [], "unknown_ids": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-328cc4f966bb" ] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-328cc4f966bb", "text": "花蓮戶政登門案（花蓮地院 114 年度訴字第 61 號）的實體判決。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [], "unknown_ids": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-004682eefda6" ] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-004682eefda6", "text": "南港豆花店的陳情內容、改善情形、複查與是否裁罰，以及店家本人的說法。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [], "unknown_ids": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b47d8ba3af75" ] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b47d8ba3af75", "text": "市場處 2026 年 9 月 9 日原函全文、2020 與 2022 年舊函，以及是否另向收文的管委會發過更正函。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [], "unknown_ids": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-af7d4a327285" ] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-af7d4a327285", "text": "台北地院 95 年度國字第 9 號國賠案是否上訴、二審是否改判、賠償是否實際給付。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [], "unknown_ids": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-3d8edd8ebf60" ] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-3d8edd8ebf60", "text": "監察院是否曾調查花蓮或台北的相關案件。" }, { "expects": { "claim_ids": [], "unknown_ids": [ "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b5d83e2430e4" ] }, "id": "query-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b5d83e2430e4", "text": "花蓮縣警局承諾往後「不得再詢問、記錄懸掛或設置民眾個資」，後來是否做到。" } ], "schema": "walkingbook-public-knowledge-v0", "source": { "path": "docs/product/evidence/walkingbook-question-1cd6307c45be6c55-editorial-review.md", "sha256": "f4781fab9df5cc0cfc96d6a144f50ed5764f54805282e5ea3de79af9910d6c27" }, "sources": [ { "id": "src-1", "published_at": "", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（三立新聞）", "url": "https://www.setn.com/news/1934196" }, { "id": "src-2", "published_at": "", "source_type": "新聞報導（轉載）", "title": "（鏡週刊轉載三立）", "url": "https://www.mirrormedia.mg/external/setn_1934196" }, { "id": "src-3", "published_at": "2025-02-20", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（中央社）", "url": "https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aloc/202502200062.aspx" }, { "id": "src-4", "published_at": "2025-02-20", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（匯流新聞網）", "url": "https://n.yam.com/Article/20250220163038" }, { "id": "src-5", "published_at": "", "source_type": "政府機關說明", "title": "（文化局說明）", "url": "https://culture.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=621F0409A1ABDD34&s=3ED3C1F693AABDCA&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6" }, { "id": "src-6", "published_at": "2025-02-15", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "民視", "url": "https://www.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2025215P07M1" }, { "id": "src-7", "published_at": "2025-02-20", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（民視）", "url": "https://health.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2025220W0362" }, { "id": "src-8", "published_at": "", "source_type": "政黨聲明", "title": "（民進黨）", "url": "https://www.dpp.org.tw/media/contents/11087" }, { "id": "src-9", "published_at": "", "source_type": "團體聲明", "title": "大安罷團", "url": "https://www.daanreboot.tw/statement" }, { "id": "src-10", "published_at": "2024-12-06", "source_type": "法規修正理由", "title": "（修正理由）", "url": "https://laws.gov.taipei/Law/LawSearch/LawReason/FL001226" }, { "id": "src-11", "published_at": "2024-12-06", "source_type": "法規", "title": "（陳情規則）", "url": "https://laws.gov.taipei/Law/LawSearch/LawArticleContent/FL001226" }, { "id": "src-12", "published_at": "2024-08", "source_type": "行政計畫", "title": "熱線實施計畫", "url": "https://www-ws.gov.taipei/001/Upload/371/relfile/18916/3219723/6c00cb65-17b1-4e1e-8ba8-0048648547ba.pdf" }, { "id": "src-13", "published_at": "2025", "source_type": "訴願決定", "title": "訴願決定", "url": "https://laws.gov.taipei/law/LawDecision/ContentExport?id=1613-029" }, { "id": "src-14", "published_at": "", "source_type": "行政作業規範", "title": "研考會的陳情作業程序", "url": "https://rdec.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=E9CD2F2C0C62A9CA&s=4FA83C0844D9830A&sms=21154756E24E458F" }, { "id": "src-15", "published_at": "2025-04-10", "source_type": "議會速記錄", "title": "（議會速記錄1）", "url": "https://obasfront.tcc.gov.tw/Agenda/DownloadFile.aspx?FileName=1410502%E6%96%BD%E6%94%BF1140410-1.doc&FilePath=&FileGrpKind=3" }, { "id": "src-16", "published_at": "2025-04-10", "source_type": "議會速記錄", "title": "（速記錄3）", "url": "https://obasfront.tcc.gov.tw/Agenda/DownloadFile.aspx?FileName=1410502%E6%96%BD%E6%94%BF1140410-3.doc&FilePath=&FileGrpKind=3" }, { "id": "src-17", "published_at": "2025-04-10", "source_type": "議會速記錄", "title": "（速記錄5）", "url": "https://obasfront.tcc.gov.tw/Agenda/DownloadFile.aspx?FileName=1410502%E6%96%BD%E6%94%BF1140410-5.doc&FilePath=&FileGrpKind=3" }, { "id": "src-18", "published_at": "", "source_type": "地方政府政策文件", "title": "（Tamworth 市議會）", "url": "https://www.tamworth.gov.uk/food-and-food-premises-complaints-policy-2025-2028" }, { "id": "src-19", "published_at": "2025-05-14", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（中央社）", "url": "https://www.cna.com.tw/news/asoc/202505140123.aspx" }, { "id": "src-20", "published_at": "2025-05-14", "source_type": "檢察機關新聞稿", "title": "（花蓮地檢署新聞稿）", "url": "https://www.hlc.moj.gov.tw/media/398127/1140514%E8%8A%B1%E6%AA%A2%E5%81%B5%E7%B5%90%E8%A2%AB%E5%91%8A%E6%98%8E-%E7%AD%89%E4%BA%BA%E6%B6%89%E5%AB%8C%E9%81%95%E5%8F%8D%E5%80%8B%E4%BA%BA%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99%E4%BF%9D%E8%AD%B7%E6%B3%95%E7%AD%89%E6%A1%88%E4%BB%B6%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E%E7%A8%BF.pdf?mediaDL=true" }, { "id": "src-21", "published_at": "", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "公視", "url": "https://news.pts.org.tw/article/751244" }, { "id": "src-22", "published_at": "2025-08-21", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（中央社）", "url": "https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aloc/202508210111.aspx" }, { "id": "src-23", "published_at": "", "source_type": "法院新聞稿", "title": "花蓮地院", "url": "https://www.judicial.gov.tw/tw/cp-1888-1323873-80f73-1.html" }, { "id": "src-24", "published_at": "2026-09-03", "source_type": "法院裁定", "title": "（裁定全文）", "url": "https://judgment.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/data.aspx?ty=JD&id=HLDM%2c114%2c%e8%a8%b4%2c61%2c20260903%2c2&ot=in" }, { "id": "src-25", "published_at": "", "source_type": "法律", "title": "（行政中立法）", "url": "https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=S0110036" }, { "id": "src-26", "published_at": "2025-07-15", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（中央社）", "url": "https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202507150146.aspx" }, { "id": "src-27", "published_at": "2026-09-18", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（中央社）", "url": "https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202609180303.aspx" }, { "id": "src-28", "published_at": "2026-09-18", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（民視財經）", "url": "https://finance.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2026918W0468" }, { "id": "src-29", "published_at": "", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（自由時報）", "url": "https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/5578578" }, { "id": "src-30", "published_at": "2026-09-18", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（鏡週刊）", "url": "https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20260918edi041" }, { "id": "src-31", "published_at": "2026-09-19", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（鏡新聞）", "url": "https://www.mnews.tw/story/20260919sot1817001" }, { "id": "src-32", "published_at": "", "source_type": "法律", "title": "（選罷法）", "url": "https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawSingle.aspx?pcode=D0020010&flno=52" }, { "id": "src-33", "published_at": "2026-09-23", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（民視）", "url": "https://www.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2026923w0233" }, { "id": "src-34", "published_at": "", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（聯合報）", "url": "https://udn.com/news/story/7323/9763789" }, { "id": "src-35", "published_at": "2026-09-19", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（中央社）", "url": "https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aloc/202609190069.aspx" }, { "id": "src-36", "published_at": "2026-11-13", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（民視）", "url": "https://www.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2026B13P12M1" }, { "id": "src-37", "published_at": "2026-11-14", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（中央社）", "url": "https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aloc/202611140081.aspx" }, { "id": "src-38", "published_at": "2019-07-18", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "高雄", "url": "https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/201907180095.aspx" }, { "id": "src-39", "published_at": "2020-12-03", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "屏東", "url": "https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aloc/202012030069.aspx" }, { "id": "src-40", "published_at": "", "source_type": "政府機關新聞稿", "title": "新北", "url": "https://www.health.ntpc.gov.tw/article/%E9%87%9D%E5%B0%8D%E8%BF%91%E6%97%A5%E6%B0%91%E4%BB%A3%E8%B3%AA%E7%96%91%E6%9F%A5%E6%B0%B4%E8%A1%A8%E7%9A%84%E7%84%A1%E7%AB%AF%E6%8C%87%E6%8E%A7%E6%96%B0%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82%E8%A1%9B%E7%94%9F%E5%B1%80%E5%9A%B4%E6%AD%A3%E9%A7%81%E6%96%A5%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E" }, { "id": "src-41", "published_at": "", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（NOWnews）", "url": "https://www.nownews.com/news/6675546" }, { "id": "src-42", "published_at": "", "source_type": "新聞報導（轉載）", "title": "（鏡報，鏡週刊轉載）", "url": "https://www.mirrormedia.mg/external/mirrordaily_95489" }, { "id": "src-43", "published_at": "", "source_type": "裁判要旨彙編", "title": "（法務部裁判要旨彙編，頁 207）", "url": "https://www.moj.gov.tw/media/2507/510613591850.pdf?mediaDL=true" }, { "id": "src-44", "published_at": "", "source_type": "函釋", "title": "（北市法規會函）", "url": "https://laws.gov.taipei/law/Interpretation/ContentExport/FE242242?type=5" }, { "id": "src-45", "published_at": "2023-05-30", "source_type": "法院判決", "title": "（最高行政法院 110 年度上字第 673 號）", "url": "https://judgment.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/printData.aspx?id=TPAA%2C110%2C%E4%B8%8A%2C673%2C20230530%2C1" }, { "id": "src-46", "published_at": "2026-04-30", "source_type": "法院判決", "title": "（桃園地院 114 年度重國字第 2 號）", "url": "https://judgment.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/printData.aspx?id=TYDV%2C114%2C%E9%87%8D%E5%9C%8B%2C2%2C20260430%2C1" }, { "id": "src-47", "published_at": "2008-06-20", "source_type": "法院判決", "title": "（台北地院 95 年度國字第 9 號）", "url": "https://judgment.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/data.aspx?ty=JD&id=TPDV%2C95%2C%E5%9C%8B%2C9%2C20080620%2C2" }, { "id": "src-48", "published_at": "", "source_type": "法律", "title": "（行政程序法）", "url": "https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0030055" }, { "id": "src-49", "published_at": "", "source_type": "開放資料集", "title": "北市陳情系統類別資料", "url": "https://data.taipei/dataset/detail?id=cb423c17-88eb-4231-a725-f1b93247d1bf" }, { "id": "src-50", "published_at": "", "source_type": "開放資料集", "title": "公共安全聯合稽查資料", "url": "https://data.taipei/api/frontstage/tpeod/dataset/resource.download?rid=d35ec628-b978-45ed-b350-110a97c0ce6b" }, { "id": "src-51", "published_at": "2018-05-08", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（韓聯社）", "url": "https://www.yna.co.kr/amp/view/AKR20180508081451005" }, { "id": "src-52", "published_at": "", "source_type": "法院新聞稿", "title": "（大法院）", "url": "https://sc.scourt.go.kr/supreme/news/NewsViewAction2.work?gubun=4&searchOption=&searchWord=&seqnum=6973" }, { "id": "src-53", "published_at": "2024", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（MBC）", "url": "https://imnews.imbc.com/news/2024/society/article/6568041_36438.html" }, { "id": "src-54", "published_at": "2022-01-21", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（NewsPim）", "url": "https://www.newspim.com/news/view/20220121000765" }, { "id": "src-55", "published_at": "2018-12-31", "source_type": "新聞報導", "title": "（韓聯社）", "url": "https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20181231209951005" }, { "id": "src-56", "published_at": "", "source_type": "法律", "title": "（韓國法令）", "url": "https://law.go.kr/lsLinkCommonInfo.do?chrClsCd=010202&lsJoLnkSeq=1016640303" }, { "id": "src-57", "published_at": "2025-07", "source_type": "法院判決", "title": "（第十一巡迴上訴法院判決）", "url": "https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/unpub/files/202312167.pdf" }, { "id": "src-58", "published_at": "", "source_type": "法院案卷", "title": "（最高法院案卷）", "url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-771.html" }, { "id": "src-59", "published_at": "1977", "source_type": "法院判決", "title": "（Mt. Healthy，U.S. Reports）", "url": "https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep429/usrep429274/usrep429274.pdf" }, { "id": "src-60", "published_at": "2024", "source_type": "法院判決", "title": "（判決全文）", "url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1025_1a72.pdf" }, { "id": "src-page", "published_at": "", "source_type": "walkingbook_public_page", "title": "被查到沒事的店，能去哪裡討公道？從南港豆花店、饒河夜市到花蓮戶政登門的「查水表」爭議", "url": "https://walkingbook.tw/inquiry/shop-inspection-political-retaliation/" } ], "unknowns": [ { "changes_claim_ids": [], "closure": "台北市研考會或各局處公布去識別後的逐店檢舉、派工、到場與協調紀錄。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-4", "e-src-15", "e-src-49" ], "id": "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-646e33082e8e", "question": "2025 年 2 月罷免店家在 1999 與各局處的逐店紀錄：檢舉件數、去重後的陳情人數、實際到場、裁罰，以及是否適用第 10、11 點和跨局處協調。", "status": "not_requested" }, { "changes_claim_ids": [], "closure": "台北市公開含地址、業別與稽查事由的稽查資料，至少涵蓋 2024 至 2025 年。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-49", "e-src-50" ], "id": "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-a83cdf1168b3", "question": "同區同業平常被稽查的頻率。", "status": "public_not_found" }, { "changes_claim_ids": [], "closure": "花蓮地院本案的實體判決書公開。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-23", "e-src-24" ], "id": "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-328cc4f966bb", "question": "花蓮戶政登門案（花蓮地院 114 年度訴字第 61 號）的實體判決。", "status": "bounded_unknown" }, { "changes_claim_ids": [], "closure": "建管處的複查結果或裁罰公文公開，或店家公開說明。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-1", "e-src-2" ], "id": "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-004682eefda6", "question": "南港豆花店的陳情內容、改善情形、複查與是否裁罰，以及店家本人的說法。", "status": "world_pending" }, { "changes_claim_ids": [], "closure": "市場處公開原函、舊函與任何更正函的完整文字。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-28", "e-src-29", "e-src-30", "e-src-33" ], "id": "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b47d8ba3af75", "question": "市場處 2026 年 9 月 9 日原函全文、2020 與 2022 年舊函，以及是否另向收文的管委會發過更正函。", "status": "public_not_found" }, { "changes_claim_ids": [], "closure": "找到能連回本案的上訴審判決或付款文件。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-47" ], "id": "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-af7d4a327285", "question": "台北地院 95 年度國字第 9 號國賠案是否上訴、二審是否改判、賠償是否實際給付。", "status": "bounded_unknown" }, { "changes_claim_ids": [], "closure": "監察院網站出現相關調查報告、糾正案或彈劾案。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-page" ], "id": "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-3d8edd8ebf60", "question": "監察院是否曾調查花蓮或台北的相關案件。", "status": "bounded_unknown" }, { "changes_claim_ids": [], "closure": "後續選舉期間有關花蓮警方記錄看板懸掛者個資的報導或官方說明。", "evidence_refs": [ "e-src-26" ], "id": "unknown-shop-inspection-political-retaliation-b5d83e2430e4", "question": "花蓮縣警局承諾往後「不得再詢問、記錄懸掛或設置民眾個資」，後來是否做到。", "status": "world_pending" } ] }